Why Canonicalization Matters From A Linking Perspective

As there are many aspects to achieving the perfect SERP on Google or Bing, we run into items which would seem complex and maybe even not applicable to our sites.  However, in the scheme of things on the Internet, even the smallest items and details are definitely going to affect where you ultimately show up.  A good explanation of canonicalization and utilization of it’s methods are detailed out by and provide an excellent insight into what the term actually means.

 

Why Canonicalization Matters From A Linking Perspective
by

Search engine optimization (SEO) can be like any other technical field of study. It is filled with specialized jargon that, to a newbie, can be more than intimidating. I recall that feeling was especially strong when I first encountered the term canonicalization.

It is a 14-letter, seven-syllable monster of a term. I first heard it spoken, and had to ask the person who said it to repeat it. It didn’t help. (It had been a long day!)

The truth of the matter is that canonicalization is not all that complicated to understand if the explanation is lucid. So let’s try to explain what it means, why it’s important, and what it has to do with linking.

What Is Canonicalization?

In mathematics, when the same data can be represented in multiple ways, it is best to standardize that representation by establishing the data’s canonical form, the one primary form in which it will be used. In the computer science field, the act of defining the canonical form of data is called canonicalization.

Simply put, canonicalization defines the one primary way you’ll use to write data, such as a URL string. As webmaster, you can choose which canonical form to use for a given URL on your site, but once selected, the chosen form should always be the way that URL is written.

Why Canonicalization Is Important

Fundamentally, you need to know that search engines do not index pages by their content. They index URLs. The content associated with the indexed URLs is brought in to the search engine database, but URLs are what possess ranking.

What complicates matters in search (and why canonicalization is important) is that the same content page can have multiple URLs associated with it.

I’m not talking about when Web spammers scrape your content and publish it on their own website. I’m talking about variations of URLs on your website all pointing to the same page.

For example, the following hypothetical URLs would likely all point to the same page (in this case, the home page of a site):

  • example.com
  • www.example.com
  • www.example.com/
  • www.example.com/index.html
  • www.example.com/index.html?var1=105
  • www.example.com/index.html?var1=105&var2=abc

As you can see, a valid URL may either include or omit the subdomain prefix “www.”, a trailing slash after the top-level domain, the default webpage name for a folder, and/or one or more URL parameter suffixes (there are even more, but these are the most common). They can also be used in various combinations. The possible permutations of the above examples can quickly add up to a large number of URLs all pointing to the same content page.

Read the entire article at: Search Engine Land

Google Study: PPC Ads Do NOT Cannibalize Your Organic Traffic

It is very common in the Internet Marketing and SEO business that we receive the question: “Does PPC take away from our organic? Or visa versa?”  While we do have our own tests and can show that it helps and not detract from organic results, customers sometimes just want more hard facts.  Queue Google.  We’re not entirely sold on Google’s opening up their internal study for all to read just purely for the kindness of their hearts, no… they are a multi-billion dollar Goliath and are always looking to refine their bottom line.  While the science in the report makes sense, validates most of our experience and research, it’s just kind of hard to take it all at face value.  However, we believe it is worth the read!

Google Study: PPC Ads Do NOT Cannibalize Your Organic Traffic

by Matt Van Wagner

 

Though I’ve never met him personally, I admit to being a big Hal Varian fan. For those who don’t recognize the name, Dr. Varian is the Chief Economist at Google and like me, one of the oldest guys in his company.

Over the past few years, he and his team of researchers have made my life simpler by providing pithy answers to some of search’s mythically difficult questions, like “How do search auctions work?” and “Does ad position effect conversion rates?

Last week, his team at Google released the results of their research that answers a question that paid search managers across the world get asked on a regular basis: “Why the [bleep] are we advertising on our own [bleeping] brand terms when we are ranked #1 for those [bleepety-bleep-bleeping] terms already?  [Bleep]!”

Though the Google research team posed the question in a slightly more scientifically-fashionable way for their research, they essentially set out to answer the question of whether or not paid search ads cannibalize traffic from corresponding organic listings for the same keywords.

Their findings, in true Varian-esque style, were simple, direct and memorable. They found that paid search ads give you a 89% incremental lift in site visitors – above and beyond traffic you would normally expect from your organic listings.

You can download the study at the Google Research Blog:  “Incremental Clicks Impact Of Search Advertising” by David X. Chan, Yuan Yuan, Jim Koehler and Deepak Kumar.

Is A Google Study That Proves Google Paid Search Works Valid?

You don’t have to be a committed cynic or skeptic to question the results of Google’s research on its own search properties. It’s only natural to raise the question of self-interest, but since Google has made no bones about the fact that it is their own research, they are being upfront and candid.

In their report, they provide pretty good detail on their methodology and their statistical methods though it is provided only in summary form.

But, in fact, the study seems to support the prevailing conventional wisdom in our industry and even some earlier studies on the impact of paid advertising on brand terms and natural traffic. It certainly supports Brad Geddes findings in his Search Engine Land column last week, “Should You Bid On A Keyword If You Rank Organically For That Term?

 

Read the entire article at: Search Engine Land

 

New Google Analytics Dashboards

You may have noticed that there is a new version of Google Analytics available.  Perhaps this is old news (and certainly in the blogosphere that could be only minutes!) but we are loving it.  Beyond the new widget capabilities, social interaction tracking, and the new look, it seems a little easier to use.  We’ll be posting more on this later but we found this article about gaining more insights with the new Google Analytics and thought we should share!

 

How To Gain Great Insights With Google Analytics Dashboards

by Klaas Knook

 

Google recently released its new Analytics interface to all of their users. Personally, I think that one of the biggest improvements is the ability to create multiple dashboards as well as the flexibility of widgets to customize your dashboard with essential metrics. This post will elaborate further on:

  • how to create (multiple) dashboards
  • the possibilities of the new dashboards
  • a few examples for your own dashboards
  • suggestions for new features

Multiple Dashboards

Google Analytics Dashboard OverviewThe new Google Analytics gives you the power to create up to 20 custom dashboards for each profile. This makes it perfect to create a separate dashboard for each department in your organization or for each traffic source.

The figure at the right shows an example of one of my own accounts with seven different custom dashboards; one for the total overview and six dedicated to a specific traffic source.

This gives the user the possibility to get a rapid and good overview of what each traffic source is doing in terms of the selected metrics like visits, bounce rate, goals, revenue, etc.

For a deeper analysis of a specific traffic source, the user can dive deeper into the different Google Analytics reports or create custom reports.

 

Read the entire article at: Search Engine Land

MapQuest Launches Local Business Listings Center

We have another contender!  The geo-targeting capabilities of the Internet have not gone unnoticed.  Google has leveraged this ability well and most recently has turned it into a new revenue source.  Ten years ago MapQuest was synonymous with trying to locate a business or address on the Internet.  But over the last couple of years with the advent of Google Maps, Google Earth and local Google results MapQuest has gone by the way side.  Only attaining +/- 6% of the map searching users, it reasons to say that they’re highly lacking.  However, they have announced a new local business listings center, similar to Google and Yahoo!  Below is an article from Matt McGee detailing out the latest announcement.  It certainly goes to show that as an SEO, you better be on your game to include the ever changing and available offerings on the net.

 

by

mapquest-local-business-logoLocal SEOs have another tool to add to the “citation belt,” as it were: MapQuest has announced its own Local Business Center, a place where local businesses can add and/or manage their listing(s) on MapQuest.

As the video below shows, the MapQuest LBC functions very much like Google’s and Bing’s and offers many of the same basic features such as photo uploads, videos, categories and so forth. MapQuest is also offering two premium listing levels at $99 and $399 per year — the latter of which includes distribution of business information to other sites like Yelp, Yahoo Local, SuperPages and others.

The MapQuest Local Business Center is currently available to US businesses only. Here’s the MapQuest intro video that shows how it works:

Read the entire article at: Search Engine Land

Google Offers Goes Live, First Portland Offer Arrives

What isn’t Google into these days?  The answer to that question is not much.  If there is a great idea that pops up on the Internet, it’s a safe bet that Google is going to notice and then try to monetize it.  After a failed attempt to purchase Groupon, Google instituted their own version.  And it appears now that it is going live in Portland.  With all of the customer data that Google retains it is no surprise that they will leverage it yet again to attain sales and yet more of your information.



Continue reading “Google Offers Goes Live, First Portland Offer Arrives” »

YouTube “First Watch” Creates Massive Reach for Video Ads

Google is the king of creating monetizing enterprises in the digital realm.  Recently they added features to target map listings (Google Boost) and forever they have tinkered with delivering advertisements through their YouTube acquisition.  As detailed below, Greg Sterling lays out the new strategy that is being researched with a good ROI.  They’re target it seems is not UGC, user generated content, so it doesn’t appear that we need to fear watching an advertisement when trying to view the latest viral craze.

Continue reading “YouTube “First Watch” Creates Massive Reach for Video Ads” »

Google’s $64 Billion Economic Impact

The impact of Google and its available tools are too undeniable of a valuable asset to the small and medium sized businesses. From Google Adwords and Google AdSenese to Google Analytics and now Google Boost, a business can determine its market space on the Internet, track conversions and give to layman sophisticated tools to gain market share and increase revenue. This sounds all well and fine for most businesses, and from our point of view at Denver Media it is completely accurate. However, where is the quantifiable proof these tools have that big of an impact? From our experience running SEO and SEM (Search Engine Marketing) campaigns, it is unquestionable and easy to see.  But most business owners are either in the dark or in denial. If one is in the dark, then we hope to help turn on the lights and show you around a bit, however if one is in denial then the earth must still be flat.

Google released it’s latest numbers showing its impact of the U.S. economy, and large increase in 2010 over 2009. Below is an article from our friends over at Search Engine Land.

 

May 16, 2011 at 4:06pm ET by Pamela Parker

In conjunction with National Small Business Week, Google is trying to burnish its image by touting the economic impact that its programs, including AdWords and AdSense, have had on the U.S. economy. According to the company, Google provided $64 billion in economic activity for American businesses and non-profits in 2010, 18% greater than the 2009 number.

The company says nearly 1 million U.S. businesses and non-profits earned income from Google tools in 2010. For every $1 a business spends on Google AdWords, the company claims, they receive an average of $8 in profit through business generated via both Google Search and AdWords. The numbers are based on a complex formula developed by Google’s chief economist Hal Varian. It starts with the assumption that every business gets $2 in business for every $1 spent on AdWords — an assumption based on data across a large pool of advertisers. Then it assumes that, for every ad click, advertisers get 5 clicks on their organic search results. More methodology from Google here.

Read Entire Article at: Search Engine Land

Search Engine Rankings – April 2011


From our partners over at OnlineMarketingDenver.net the article below outlines the new comScore ratings from last month and the changes in search engine market shares.

Read their blog at: Online Marketing Denver

comScore recently released April 2011search engine rankings report.  This report shows overall market share / usage of the top search engines.

Here is the recap in order of usage:

  • Google search market share fell to 65.4 percent, a loss of .3 percent in March.
  • Yahoo grew to 15.9 percent, a gain of .2 percent.
  • Bing grew to 14.1 percent, a gain of .2 percent.
  • Ask fell to 3 percent, a loss of .1 percent.
  • AOL fell to 1.5 percent, a loss of .1 percent.

The graph below shows search query’s in millions.  Americans conducted more than 18.0 billion total core search queries in April. Google Sites ranked first with 11.6 billion searches, followed by Yahoo! Sites with 3.2 billion and Microsoft Sites with 2.5 billion according to comScore.

comScore April Search engine marketing search mapSource: comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2011

Most of the customers I consult with have been content running on the Google network alone, however the data above shows that limiting yourself to one network is only allowing you 65.4% coverage.  This means that they are missing 34% of potential customers/clients/or patients.  I always recommend we run all tier one search engines and allocate the budget appropriately, this way we have the broadest reach and will be available to 98% of the searches conducted.

With this in mind, Chris has the ability to provide accurate data as it relates to the conversions (CBO – Conversion based optimization) that come from each search engine independently, and he is able to move money between engines providing less impact to those that have better results.  Often times those customers that were just running on Google get far better results from other engines.   This is just one more reason that running your program with the largest provider of local internet search to SMB’s in the United States just makes sense. Chris can provide you solutions that small boutiques can’t touch.

Google Updates AdWords

Google announced some changes to their algorithm that updates how Adwords and the Keyword Generator operate.  One of the apparent bonuses is that marketers can now target Tablets separately from other campaigns.

Below is a post from Search Engine Land detailing out some of the changes:

 

Google AdWords Can Now Target Tablets Separately

by Greg Sterling

Just as Google began to allow users to separate their AdWords campaigns on smartphones from their PC campaigns, the company is now letting advertisers separately target tablets. It becomes another check box on the AdWords “networks and devices” screen.

Here’s what Google said in its blog post:

In the next couple of weeks, the “Networks and Devices” section of your Settings tab within your AdWords account will include a new targeting option titled “Tablets with full browsers.” While you’ve been able to specifically target Apple iPad devices in the past, the new capability will enable you to easily target your ads to the entire tablet device category. In addition, you’ll be able to select more precisely the types of devices and operating systems on which your AdWords ads will show. For example, to display your ads on the Apple iPad, you’ll be able to choose “Tablets with full browsers” as your device targeting setting and “iOS” as your operating system setting. Tablet targeting will be available initially for Apple devices only, but we’ll expand ad serving to other specific devices in the near future.

Read the entire article at: Search Engine Land

Google Analytics Now Tracking Server Speed

Nothing will frustrate users more than a slow server delivering up a website.  Regardless of what might be causing the issue the user will usually blame “the Internets” or your sites, click the back button, and costing you a potential visitor.  To help in this regard Google has integrated a new speed metric into their analytics script.   This has many advantages: tracking which pages serve slow, landing page optimization, DB queries verses static web pages, dynamic media rich page load times, etc.  For us in the industry it is something that we need to look at, and has been hinted as part of the Google SERP algorithm.   On Google’s Analytics website the introduce the technology this way:

The Site Speed report measures the page load time (latency) for a sample of pageviews on your website pages. It appears in the Content section of the Analytics reports. With this report, you can see which pages load the fastest and which ones are slower. You can also analyze your overall site speed along other important dimensions in order to learn how your site speed relates to a variety of factors. For example, you can view your site speed across the following categories:

  • Content—which landing pages are slowest?
  • Traffic sources—which campaigns correspond to faster page loads overall?
  • Visitor—how does latency compare by visitor type or geographic region?
  • Technology—does browser, operating system or screen resolution impact latency metrics?

Finally—and most importantly—you can take action to improve page load speed for slower pages and then track latency along these other dimensions to see if your actions resulted in desired improvements.

Read more at the Google Analytics Help site: Google Analytics Support

Additionally Daniel Waisberg has writting a great article breaking this down:

New Google Analytics Feature: Load Time Measurement

May 4, 2011 at 5:03pm ET by Daniel Waisberg

Since the beginning of last year, Google Analytics has been pushing a faster load time by pushing the new asynchronous tracking code to being the default code. Matt Cutts also commented on how the new Google Analytics code is slightly better in terms of search (watch video on the bottom of this article).

But now, with the addition of Site Speed to Google Analytics*, we will be able to understand how load times affect not only search ranking (or ppc quality score), but also how it affects user experience and ultimately, the conversion rates of specific pages and the site as a whole.

Google Analytics site speed
New Site Speed Report in Google Analytics – Track Page Load Time

The big value of these new metrics is that it enables us to correlate page success and load times.

This is especially important when it comes to landing page optimization, but also when optimizing pages with and without rich media, pages that query a database before loading, and others.

Read the entire article at: Search Engine Land